<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Da Vinci Planet &#187; Web Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davinciplanet.com/category/web-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com</link>
	<description>A blog on productivity tools, tips and hacks for Web professionals, including topics on search marketing (SEO and SEM), Web analytics and on-line trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4 Free Competitive Metrics Research Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/4-free-competitive-analytics-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/4-free-competitive-analytics-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Apps & Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the online marketing world, research tools like comScore Media Metrix, Nielsen Net Ratings and Hitwise are considered the authority for competitive metrics. But their measurement methods have been challenged and new and interesting competition has been booming. Significantly Google, the uber online force, has entered the space which means that the premium services are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/ad-planner-compete-alexa-quancast1.jpg" alt="" title="Google Ad Planner vs. Compete vs. Alexa vs. Quancast" width="264" height="182" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-278" />In the online marketing world, research tools like <a href="http://www.comscore.com/metrix/">comScore Media Metrix</a>, <a href="http://www.nielsen-online.com/">Nielsen Net Ratings</a> and <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/">Hitwise</a> are considered the authority for competitive metrics. But their measurement methods have been <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/49257-soon-to-be-worthless-nielsen-net-ratings-and-comscore-media-metrix">challenged</a> and new and interesting competition has been booming. Significantly Google, the uber online force, has entered the space which means that the premium services are under pressure to reduce prices and deliver better products &#8211; great for us consumers! </p>
<p>No one market research tool is perfect and often it is best to look at more than one to get the information that you need.  It is so much easier when they&#8217;re free!  So here are four of the best free tools that you can use for competitive analysis.<span id="more-225"></span></p>
<h2>Google Ad Planner</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/google-ad-planner.png" alt="Google Ad Planner" title="google-ad-planner" width="346" height="277" class="alignright" /><br />
The [big] new kid on the block that <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/06/introducing-google-ad-planner.html">launched</a> a few months ago, and when it did it <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06252008/business/comscore_whacked_by_google_117051.htm">knocked</a> comScore shares down by over twenty percent.  In typical Google style it is free and all you need is a Google account &#8211; that&#8217;s why we love Google!. The reason why <a href="http://www.google.com/adplanner">Google Ad Planner</a> made such an impact on comScore shares is because Google has so much more data &#8211; and information &#8211; at their disposal and just like Search, they have the ability to crush anyone in that space.  Ad Planner gathers its data from:</p>
<blockquote><p>a variety of sources, such as aggregated Google search data, opt-in anonymous Google Analytics data, opt-in external consumer panel data, and other third-party market research. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/adplanner/bin/answer.py?answer=98132&#038;topic=14715">link</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Ad Planner has huge potential with their incredible database of marketing intelligence.  Learn more about Ad Planner from <a href="http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2008/08/competitive-intelligence-analysis-google-ad-planner.html">this</a> great post by <a href="http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/about">Avinash Kaushik</a>. </p>
<p>P.S. It is quite disturbing that they <a href="https://www.google.com/adplanner/planning/site_details#google.com">block</a> stats to google.com, but not to <a href="https://www.google.com/adplanner/planning/site_details#yahoo.com">Yahoo!</a> or <a href="https://www.google.com/adplanner/planning/site_details#live.com">Microsoft</a>!  <em>(You need to be logged in with your Google account to access these links)</em></p>
<h2>Quantcast</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/quantcast1.png" alt="" title="Quantcast" width="310" height="238" class="alignright size-full wp-image-258" />The two year old company has been making <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/quantcast.com">quite</a> a <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/digital-downloads/broadband/e3if0ded1d484f712c4e39981189c7f2c1c">splash</a>. <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/">Quantcast&#8217;s</a> claim to fame is that they supplement panel data with server-level data from participating publishers via JavaScript tagging. What I do find really interesting is their approach towards bridging the gap between on-line and off-line marketing data: <em>less people than cookies, rather than more people than circulation</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Addressing this challenge requires innovation in bridging the inherent differences between the directly measureable cookies and estimates of people. This is not unlike challenges that the media industry has previously faced in bridging the â€œwhatâ€? (raw traffic) and the â€œwhoâ€? (actual people) in Print. The magazine industry provides an analogy to the challenges in the digital space in that circulation is a â€œcensusâ€? level data point (it represents the reported number of magazines printed and distributed) which is coupled with panel data for people-based adjustments (readers per copy, demographics, etc). As we shall see, in digital the correction factors are reversed (less people than cookies, rather than more people than circulation) but the hybrid approach leveraging raw circulation and panel data is relevant. <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/white-papers/quantcast-cookie-corrected-audience-white-paper.pdf">link</a></p></blockquote>
<h2>Compete</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/compete.png" alt="" title="Compete" width="289" height="262" class="alignright size-full wp-image-260" />CompeteInc, a research firm, also launched their competitive analytics service called <a href="http://www.compete.com/">Compete</a> about 2 years ago and they are seen as the main Alexa <a href="http://blog.compete.com/2006/12/11/compete-vs-alexa-competitive-site-metrics/">alternative</a>, mostly because of their toolbar.  Compete collects it&#8217;s click stream data from participating ISPs, the Compete Toolbar and opt-in panels. Not everyone <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/review-compete/">approved</a> <a href="http://www.traffick.com/2007/02/on-alexa-competecom-quantcast-et-al.asp">at</a> <a href="http://www.webanalyticsbook.com/other-webanalytic-software/competecom-vs-alexa/">first</a>, but they have been quite busy as can be seen in their <a href="http://blog.compete.com/">blog</a> and they are continually improving. </p>
<p>However, they really are punting their premium services and are not giving enough away for free. Their free Site Analytics reports are the main attraction and they are excellent, but their Search Analytics and Referral Analytics are simply sample teasers. Perhaps they&#8217;ll loosen up now that Google has entered the market space!</p>
<h2>Alexa</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/">Alexa</a> has been around for a decade in spite of all the <a href="http://commetrics.com/?p=45">criticism</a> of their data collection methods and how their stats can be <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/manipulating-alexa-traffic-rankings/3044/">manipulated</a>.  Even McAfee SiteAdvisor <a href="http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/alexa.com?version=2&#038;core_ver=1.0&#038;pip=false&#038;premium=false&#038;suite=false&#038;client_ver=2.0.0.0&#038;aff_id=683&#038;os_ver=5.1.2.0&#038;locale=en-us&#038;">warns</a> that their toolbar could be spyware. However, it remains a handy tool for quickly checking Web site metrics and for doing sanity checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/4-free-competitive-analytics-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spy on Web Analytics Tracking Scripts Using WASP</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/spy-on-web-analytics-tracking-scripts-using-wasp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/spy-on-web-analytics-tracking-scripts-using-wasp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/spy-on-web-analytics-tracking-scripts-using-wasp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people know that Web analytics providers like Google Analytics and Omniture use JavaScript to track user activity on Web sites, but many people do not realize that ad networks like Google Adsense and DoubleClick also track user behavior. It&#8217;s even scarier for Web site owners to realize that these third party services have complete [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people know that <a href="http://www.davinciplanet.com/tag/web-analytics/">Web analytics</a> providers like Google Analytics and Omniture use JavaScript to track user activity on Web sites, but many people do not realize that ad networks like Google Adsense and DoubleClick also track user behavior. It&#8217;s even scarier for Web site owners to realize that these third party services have complete visibility into your Web site traffic. <a href="http://wasp.immeria.net/">WASP</a> is a Firefox plugin that shows what each of these providers are tracking on the page that you are viewing.<span id="more-212"></span></p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve installed the plugin and accepted the terms and conditions, you will start seeing the WASP icon in your browser&#8217;s status bar that tells you which tracking tools it has identified.<br />
<center><a href='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wasp_footer.png' title='WASP Web analytics tracking footer'><img src='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wasp_footer.png' alt='WASP Web analytics tracking footer' /></a></center></p>
<p>Clicking on the icon will open a sidebar with a tabbed view of all the tracking tools.  Each tab represents a tracking instance on the page you are viewing, e.g. an ad, and shows the detailed data that is being sent to them.<br />
<center><a href='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wasp_sidebar.png' title='WASP Web analytics sidebar'><img src='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wasp_sidebar.png' alt='WASP Web analytics sidebar' /></a></center></p>
<p>WASP is a very useful debugging tool for implementing Web analytics solutions like Omniture because it gives you an easy way to see if you have tagged your Web site correctly. I used the &#8220;Omniture debugger&#8221; until recently when I heard about WASP in an Omniture training session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/spy-on-web-analytics-tracking-scripts-using-wasp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Advanced Google Analytics Tricks</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/advanced-google-analytics-hacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/advanced-google-analytics-hacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 02:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/2007/05/10/advanced-google-analytics-hacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7 Advanced Google Analytics tricks and hacks to help you understand GA better and help you get more from Web analytics ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/advanced-google-analytics.png' alt='Advanced Google Analytics tricks' class='alignright' height='161' width='282'/>In a previous post on the <a href="/2006/10/07/top-web-analytics-tools/">best Web analytics solutions</a> I mentioned that in my view Omniture is the clear leader in enterprise Web analytics and that Google Analytics is the best free solution.  Omniture has spoilt me and I often wish I could get a little more out of GA (which I use on Da Vinci Planet).  After some digging around I found a few hacks that enable valuable reports in Google Analytics, including full referrer URLs, file downloads, and custom segmentation.<span id="more-157"></span></p>
<h3>1. How to track file downloads, clicks on outbound links or Flash</h3>
<p>Google Analytics provides an easy way to track clicks on links that lead to file downloads like PDFs or MP3s, outbound links and Flash.  Simply include an onClick event in the hyperlink that calls the <code>urchinTracker</code> JavaScript. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27229&#038;topic=2978">Link</a>.</p>
<p><H3>2. Integrate Google Website Optimizer with Google Analytics</H3><br />
Website Optimizer is a multivariate web page testing tool that can help you understand which web page designs really work. It uses a javascript code snippet very similar to Google Analytics. However, Website Optimizer only uses <em>conversion rate</em> as the metric to determine which combination of variations is best. You can use GA with Website Optimizer to use more valuable metrics like Page Value, Avg. Time and Bounce Rate. <a href="http://www.roirevolution.com/blog/2007/04/google_website_optimizer_and_google_analytics_use.html">Link</a>.</p>
<h3>3. Identify additional search engines in the Referral reports</h3>
<p>By default, GA tracks referrals from 20 search engines, however, you can add additional search engines by adding <code>_uOsr</code> and <code>_uOkw</code> variables to your tracking code.  When you look closely at your Referring Source report you may notice some sources where the Medium is &#8220;referral&#8221; and that are search results on Web sites that should come through as &#8220;organic&#8221;. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27286&#038;topic=7228">Link</a>.</p>
<h3>4. Tracking full referrer URLs</h3>
<p>A common complaint about Google Analytics is that it truncates URLs at the end of the pagename and cuts off the querystring.  So on sites that use query parameters as page identifiers, some reports will show aggregate numbers for those pages. There are two ways one can address this issue:<br />
1. Use the <code>urchinTracker</code> to record the whole URL. <a href="http://www.reubenyau.com/google-analytics-hack-obtaining-full-referring-url/">Link</a><br />
2. Create a User-defined report by using Custom Filters. With Custom Filters you can manipulate data before GA simplifies it and therefore one can do lots of interesting things like extracting segments into extra profiles. <a href="http://www.vdgraaf.info/filters-in-google-analytics.html">Link</a>.</p>
<h3>5. Track AdSense clicks</h3>
<p>There is a lot of debate on the legality of using GA to track AdSense clicks, but if you are interested this is how you can do it.  <a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/001370.shtml">Link</a>.</p>
<h3>6. Custom Segmentation</h3>
<p>The <code>utmSetVar</code> variable can be used to assign users to a certain segment.  E.g. you could use the variable to track users that viewed a particular page.  The variable populates the User-Defined report (<em>Marketing Optimization > Visitor Segment Performance > User-Defined</em>) report.  Note that only the first value of this variable is recorded. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27219&#038;query=utmSetVar&#038;topic=&#038;type=">Link</a>.</p>
<p><H3>7. Use link tagging to track campaigns</H3><br />
You can use GA to track all your campaigns including email campaigns.  AdWords campaigns are tracked by default if the account is linked to your GA account, however you need to tag your links in order to use campaign tracking for other campaigns. Link tagging simply requires you to add certain parameters to your URL and Google has a nifty URL Builder for the purpose. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/analytics/bin/answer.py?answer=27254">Link</a>.</p>
<p>UPDATE:  The new version of Google Analytics is out and while the reports have changed the configuration and advanced tricks mentioned above have not. Phew!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/advanced-google-analytics-hacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demographic Predictions For Keywords Using adCenter</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/demographic-predictions-for-keywords-using-adcenter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/demographic-predictions-for-keywords-using-adcenter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adCenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search funnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/2007/04/08/demographic-predictions-for-keywords-using-adcenter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you own, manage or are in some way involved in a Web site then chances are that you want to know what kind of demographic you are attracting. Are they male or female, young or old? It&#8217;s especially interesting when you&#8217;re considering paid keywords to attract users. For instance, you may have been trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you own, manage or are in some way involved in a Web site then chances are that you want to know what kind of demographic you are attracting. Are they male or female, young or old? It&#8217;s especially interesting when you&#8217;re considering paid keywords to attract users. For instance, you may have been trying to target the hippies from the 60&#8242;s using the keyword <em>flower power</em>; meanwhile you are attracting young women in their twenties and early thirties! <a href="http://adlab.msn.com/">Microsoft adCenter Labs</a>, the R&#038;D team for paid search at Microsoft, offers surprisingly cool paid search researching tools. Their analysis is based on MSN Search data which represents a significant sample group, even if they&#8217;re small compared to Google. Their <strong>Demographics Prediction</strong> tool returns this interesting and visually pleasing result for <em>flower power</em>:<img src='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/adcenter-demographics.png' alt='adCenter Demographics for flower power' width='484' height='428' class='centered'/><span id="more-138"></span></p>
<p>The <strong>Search Funnels</strong> tool offers another very interesting Web analysis. It answers the question: What do users search for after they searched for the keyword in question.  E.g. what did users search for after they first searched for <em>flower power</em>?  adCenter helps you visualize and analyze your customers&#8217; search behaviors.<center><img src='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/adcenter-search-funnel.png' alt='AdCenter Search Funnel'  width='453' height='190'/></center></p>
<p>These kinds of Web analytics tools are very useful for effective paid search campaigns. Some of the other tools that they offer are:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Keyword forecast</strong>: Forecast the impressions count and demographic predictions using one or more search terms.</li>
<li><strong>Seasonal keyword forecast</strong>: Forecast the seasonality patterns of search queries</li>
<li><strong>Detecting online commercial intent</strong>: Find out if your customer intends to buy, sell or complete another online transaction based on their search queries and/or other sites visited</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/demographic-predictions-for-keywords-using-adcenter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Do HTML Title Tags Affect SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/title-tags-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/title-tags-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress plugin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/2007/01/21/title-tags-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is said that title tags are one of the most important of the on-page factors for SEO. So I put it to the test. A couple of weeks ago I implemented the SEO Title Tag plugin for WordPress which updated the HTML titles of my pages to be &#8220;more SEO friendly&#8221;. The idea was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is said that title tags are one of the most important of the on-page factors for SEO. So I put it to the test. A couple of weeks ago I implemented the <a title="SEO Title Tag plugin" href="http://www.davinciplanet.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-tag-cloud-and-other-seo-tips/">SEO Title Tag plugin</a> for WordPress which updated the HTML titles of my pages to be &#8220;more SEO friendly&#8221;. </p>
<p align="center"><img id="image99" alt="google_serp.gif" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/google_serp.gif" /></p>
<p>The idea was to give keywords more importance in title tags by placing them first, e.g. a page formerly titled &#8220;<font color="#003399">Da Vinci Planet â€ºâ€º Blog Archive â€ºâ€º <strong>Essential Portable Apps</strong></font>&#8221; is now titled &#8220;<font color="#003399"><strong>Essential Portable Apps</strong> | Da Vinci Planet</font>&#8220;.   Google&#8217;s search results pages have since updated and are now showing the &#8220;SEO friendly&#8221; page titles.  The results are somewhat surprising! <span id="more-98"></span></p>
<h4>For the search term &#8220;essential portable apps&#8221;</h4>
<p><u>Before</u>: Positioned 2nd of about 1,370,000 results</p>
<p><img id="image92" alt="essential portable apps serp1" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/seo_title_portable-apps.gif" /></p>
<p><u>Now</u>: Positioned 2nd of about 1,390,000 results</p>
<p><img id="image93" alt="essential portable apps serp2" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/seo_title_portable-apps2.gif" /></p>
<p><u>Result</u>: Position unchanged</p>
<h4>For the search term &#8220;remove popcorn&#8221; </h4>
<p><u>Before</u>: Positioned 3rd of about 1,140,000 results</p>
<p><img id="image94" alt="remove popcorn serp1" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/seo_title_remove_popcorn.gif" /></p>
<p><u>Now</u>:  Positioned 5th of about 1,260,000 results</p>
<p><img id="image95" alt="remove popcorn serp2" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/seo_title_remove_popcorn2.gif" /></p>
<p><u>Result</u>: Position down from 3rd to 5th</p>
<h4>For the search term &#8220;Top Web Analytics Tools&#8221; </h4>
<p><u>Before</u>: Positioned 94th of about 18,100,000 results</p>
<p><img id="image96" alt="Top Web Analytics Tools serp1" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/seo_title_web_analytics.gif" /></p>
<p><u>Now</u>: Positioned 280th of about 23,400,000 results</p>
<p><img id="image97" alt="Top Web Analytics Tools serp2" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/seo_title_web_analytics2.gif" /></p>
<p><u>Result</u>: Position down from 94th to 280th! Total indexed Web pages increased by about 30%.</p>
<h4>Conclusion </h4>
<p>My position went down for two of the three search terms. Especially the last one, from 94th to 280th! Not that 94th was any good to start with: ) The number of pages that Google has indexed on the Web has increased for all three search terms &#8211; as one would expect &#8211; and that may have an effect. It&#8217;s possible that my page rankings were affected simply because Google detected that the pages were modified. I&#8217;ve heard that old is good when it comes to search engines. If that is true then it&#8217;s possible their rankings will improve over time. For now I&#8217;ll hope so and I will be checking from time to time how they are doing. Either way I&#8217;m sticking with the new title format because it looks better. Blissful ignorance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/title-tags-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Web Analytics Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/top-web-analytics-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/top-web-analytics-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/2006/10/07/top-web-analytics-tools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web analytic tools have come a long way since log file analysis. Once Webtrends ruled the domain, but in recent years client side visitor tracking has come to the forefront and companies like Omniture and Google Analytics (formerly Urchin) are dominating. Omniture, in particular, has a very rich business optimization offering and is the leader [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web analytic tools have come a long way since log file analysis. Once Webtrends ruled the domain, but in recent years client side visitor tracking has come to the forefront and companies like Omniture and Google Analytics (formerly Urchin) are dominating. Omniture, in particular, has a very rich business optimization offering and is the leader in the enterprise market. Omniture&#8217;s Discover and Data Warehouse tools are what make them really stand apart. Google Analytics is the favorite in the free tools department and while it doesn&#8217;t have the depth Of Omniture, it is a fantastic tool for small sites and offers a lot of enterprise level features. I have worked a lot with a few of the tools including Webtrends, NetTracker, Omniture, Google Analytics and Webalizer, however, many new tools that track visitor behavior have appeared so I thought I&#8217;d take a look.<span id="more-25"></span></p>
<p>There are two main methods how Web analytic tools work: log analysis and client side tracking. From experience I can say that client side tracking is by far the best. There are very few benefits of log analysis.  Here&#8217;s a list of prominent Web analytics tools.</p>
<p><a title="Omniture SiteCatalyst" href="http://www.omniture.com/">Omniture</a><br />
Provides real-time measurement and monitoring of a siteâ€™s key performance indicators via client side tracking.<img id="image26" alt="Omniture SiteCatalyst" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/omniture_sitecatalyst.JPG" /></p>
<p><a title="Google Analytics" href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">Google Analytics</a><br />
Free (for most) client side tracking with a easy to use user interface.<br />
<img id="image23" alt="Google Analytics" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/google_analytics.JPG" /></p>
<p><a title="Webtrends" href="http://www.webtrends.com/">WebTrends</a><br />
They have always been the leader, but it seems they got hung on log analyis and while they now offer both client side tracking and log analysis solutions they have fallen behind.<br />
<img id="image24" alt="Webtrends" src="http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/webtrends.JPG" /></p>
<p><a title="NetTracker" href="http://www.sane.com/index.html">NetTracker</a><br />
They positioned themselves against Webtrends and also got caught in the middle between Omniture and Google Analytics with not much room. Log based and tracking pixel solutions available.</p>
<p><a title="WebSideStory" href="https://www.websidestory.com/">WebSideStory</a><br />
Omniture&#8217;s closest competitor. Great enterprise solution, but they don&#8217;t seem to have the pasion that Omniture has for their business.</p>
<p><a title="The Webalizer" href="http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/">The Webalizer</a><br />
Free log based analysis that&#8217;s been around for a while and many hosting providers offer Webalizer with their hosting solutions.</p>
<p><a title="Nielsen//Netratings SiteCensus" href="http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/mktg.jsp?section=ps_sc">Nielsen//Netratings</a><br />
Nielsen have the name, but they didn&#8217;t have a product so they bought RedSheriff. Enterprise solution that falls short of Omniture and WebSideStory.</p>
<p><a title="Opentracker" href="http://www.opentracker.net">Opentracker</a><br />
Opentracker is tracking pixel based. Not free, but inexspensinve. Has interesting live <a title="Opentracker demo" href="http://www.opentracker.net/en/demo/demo1.jsp">demo</a>.</p>
<p><a title="OneStat" href="http://www.onestat.com/">OneStat</a><br />
Free stat counter.</p>
<p><a title="DeepMetrix" href="http://www.deepmetrix.com/">DeepMetrix LiveSTATS</a><br />
Recently purchased by Microsoft. Will most probably be offered free as a Google Analytics alternative. More to come!</p>
<p><a title="ClickTracks" href="http://www.clicktracks.com/">ClickTracks</a><br />
ClickTracks Appetizer &#8211; software, log based &#8211; is available for free.</p>
<p><a title="Coremetrics" href="http://www.coremetrics.com">Coremetrics</a><br />
Has a partnership with IBM and offers an analytics olution tailored for WebSphere Commerce customers.</p>
<p><a title="AWStats" href="http://awstats.sourceforge.net/">AWStats</a><br />
Free, open source. An alternative to Webalizer.</p>
<p><a title="Clickstream" href="http://www.clickstream.com/index2.html">Clickstream</a><br />
Log based and tracking pixel solutions available, however, not on an ASP model so you host your own analysis software.</p>
<p>Other Web analytics solutions:<br />
<a title="eVisit Analyst" href="http://www.evisitanalyst.com">eVisit Analyst</a><br />
<a title="IndexTools " href="http://www.indextools.com/">IndexTools</a><br />
<a title="SageMetrics" href="http://www.sagemetrics.com">SageMetrics</a><br />
<a title="WebtraffIQ" href="http://www.webtraffiq.com">WebtraffIQ</a><br />
<a href="http://mybloglog.com/">MyBlogLog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/top-web-analytics-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Website traffic comparisons using Alexaholic</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/website-traffic-comparisons-using-alexaholic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/website-traffic-comparisons-using-alexaholic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/2006/09/13/website-traffic-comparisons-using-alexaholic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alexa uses statistics gathered with it&#8217;s browser toolbar to estimate traffic to Web sites. While the toolbar&#8217;s purpose is questionable amongst those concerned about privacy, the free traffic stats can be very useful. Alexaholic uses alexa.com&#8217;s traffic data to create comparisons. Alexaholic blends Alexa website traffic graphs with a lightweight ajax-enhanced interface to satisfy hard-core [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Alexa" href="http://alexa.com">Alexa</a> uses statistics gathered with it&#8217;s browser toolbar to estimate traffic to Web sites. While the toolbar&#8217;s purpose is questionable amongst those concerned about privacy, the free traffic stats can be very useful. <a title="alexaholic" href="http://www.alexaholic.com/">Alexaholic</a> uses alexa.com&#8217;s traffic data to create comparisons.</p>
<blockquote><p>Alexaholic blends Alexa website traffic graphs with a lightweight ajax-enhanced interface to satisfy hard-core Alexa traffic chart junkies â€“ aka Alexaholics.</p>
<p>Webmasters, SEO/SEM specialists, and domain owners can compare and measure website statistics for up to five domains at once, switch traffic chart types and ranges without page loads, and generate report pages that are easily bookmarked and shared.</p></blockquote>
<p align="left">Not surprisingly though, Alexaholic <a title="Alexa comparison between Google and Yahoo" href="http://www.alexaholic.com/google.com+yahoo.com">reports</a> that Yahoo gets about three times as much traffic as Google (click on page views tab). <img src='http://www.davinciplanet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/website-traffic-comparisons-using-alexaholic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Add Google Analytics to your WordPress blog</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/add-google-analytics-to-your-wordpress-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/add-google-analytics-to-your-wordpress-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Apps & Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-line Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/2006/08/29/add-google-analytics-to-your-wordpress-blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Analytics is arguably the best free Web analytics tool available. It&#8217;s free and they have now made it available to everyone. To sign up go to google.com/analytics and login using your Google account info. After creating an account you will be guided through the steps to set up your first profile. Copy the tracking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Analytics is arguably the best free Web analytics tool available. It&#8217;s free and they have now made it available to everyone. To sign up go to <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics">google.com/analytics</a> and login using your Google account info. After creating an account you will be guided through the steps to set up your first profile. Copy the tracking code or keep it close for the next step.</p>
<p>There are two ways to add the tracking code to your WordPress blog: 1) by installing a plug-in and 2) by editing the theme source pages directly.</p>
<p><strong>Install a Google Analytics plug-in.</strong><br />
There are a number of plug-ins available for free and they are mostly similar and very easy to use, including:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cavemonkey50.com/code/google-analyticator/">Google Analyticator</a></li>
<li><a href="http://boakes.org/analytics">Boakes Google Analytics Plugin for WordPress</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.semiologic.com/software/google-analytics/">Semiologic Google analytics plugin for WordPress</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.oratransplant.nl/uga/">OraTransplant &#8211; Ultimate Google Analytics plugin for WordPress</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Edit your WordPress pages directly.</strong><br />
This is probably the no so smart option, but since I did it I might as well mention it. You will need to edit the source of your theme pages. Login to your WordPress admin tool, select the <em>Presentation</em> tab and then <em>Theme Editor</em>. The Header (header.php) or Footer (footer.php) is normally the best place to insert your Google Analytics code, but make sure that you insert it after the <code>&lt;body&gt;</code> tag in the Header or before the <code>&lt;/body&gt;</code> tag in the Footer, depending on which file you inserted the code. After saving the file, preview your blog and view the page source to verify that the tracking code has been inserted. Google Analytics can can lag a few hours to show traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/add-google-analytics-to-your-wordpress-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

