<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Da Vinci Planet &#187; search algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davinciplanet.com/tag/search-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com</link>
	<description>A blog on productivity tools, tips and hacks for Web professionals, including topics on search marketing (SEO and SEM), Web analytics and on-line trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why an Open Source Search Algorithm is the Answer</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciplanet.com/why-an-open-source-search-algorithm-is-the-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davinciplanet.com/why-an-open-source-search-algorithm-is-the-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Da Vinci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search algorithm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciplanet.com/why-an-open-source-search-algorithm-is-the-answer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is known for their free services, open APIs and their &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; motto. For most part they aren&#8217;t evil, but keeping their search algorithm a secret is just plain evil. Microsoft is known as a closed source software giant with a desktop OS monopoly. What makes Google any different when they have a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is known for their free services, open APIs and their &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; motto. For most part they aren&#8217;t evil, but keeping their search algorithm a secret is just plain evil.  Microsoft is known as a closed source software giant with a desktop <em>OS</em> monopoly. What makes Google any different when they have a proprietary search algorithm and they have a <em>Web</em> monopoly?  Why don&#8217;t they open their search algorithm?  The reasons are very similar to why Microsoft has kept their code closed and ironically Google too can become victim of the power of social computing and open source.<span id="more-187"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://alpha.search.wikia.com/">Wikia Search</a> launched today and while there has been <a href="http://search.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Search_Wikia#Where_is_the_code">much</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/06/wikia-search-is-a-complete-letdown/">criticism</a>, their <a href="http://search.wikia.com/wiki/Search_Wikia">principals</a> make total sense:</p>
<blockquote>
<li><strong>Transparency</strong> &#8211; Openness in how the systems and algorithms operate, both in the form of open source licenses and open content + APIs. </li>
<li><strong>Community</strong> &#8211; Everyone is able to contribute in some way (as individuals or entire organizations), strong social and community focus. </li>
<li><strong>Quality</strong> &#8211; Significantly improve the relevancy and accuracy of search results and the searching experience. </li>
<li><strong>Privacy</strong> &#8211; Must be protected, do not store or transmit any identifying data. </li>
</blockquote>
<p>Google gives &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/">guidelines</a>&#8221; on how to make Web sites more SEO friendly, but why not offer complete <em>transparency</em> to their algorithm? The first reaction is because the algorithm is very, very complex and that an open source algorithm could be abused by those that find loopholes. Well it is already being abused by <a href="http://seoblackhat.com/black-hat-seo/">Black Hat SEO practices</a> and that is exactly why it should be socially driven and open source!  It is the very reason why open source solutions like Linux and Apache are a success: Open and engaged communities have much more combined knowledge than closed communities can ever have &#8211; even more than the smart Google engineers.  For now Google is riding the wave that Microsoft did in the nineties, but sooner or later they will come under pressure and will be faced with the decision to open up their algorithm or not.  </p>
<p>To me, the four principals of Internet search that Wikia Search has identified defines what Google means by &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; and while their alpha release may be disappointing I applaud Wikia for doing this.  Just like open source supporters have fought Microsoft, I believe the social computing community will be fighting Google some day. An ungrateful irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davinciplanet.com/why-an-open-source-search-algorithm-is-the-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

